View Academics in Greenman v. Yuba Power Products on Academia.edu. University. Tom Huss BLAW 300 4/18/16 Case Brief #3 Greenman v. Yuba Power Products William Greenman was injured while using a power tool that had been given to him by his wife who had purchased the tool from a retailer. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. Case Study . Plaintiff brought this action for damages against the retailer and the manufacturer of a Shopsmith, a combination power tool that could be used as a saw, drill, and wood lathe. Audio Image Video Link. Please reload. Joseph, Maria Juez, Freddy Kilcoyne, Liam Greenman v. (24 Jan, 1963) 24 Jan, 1963; Subsequent References; Similar Judgments; GREENMAN v. YUBA POWER PRODUCTS, INC. 59 Cal.2d 57 377 P.2d 897 27 Cal.Rptr. Holt, Macomber, Graham & Baugh and William H. Macomber for Defendant and Appellant. Opinion for Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc., 59 Cal. Write a brief on the Greenman v. YubaPreview the document Supreme Court case. No. Case Date: … Jan. 24, 1963. 218 Cal.App.2d 855 - CRANE v. SEARS ROEBUCK & CO., Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District. Yuba Power Products sold the Shopsmith line to some employees, who incorporated under the name Magna American Corp. Yuba Power Products was a subsidiary of Yuba Consolidated Industries, Inc., which also made some woodworking machinery. Talk:Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. Jump to navigation Jump to search. Conclusion THE RULE OF LAW Individuals injured by products with design or manufacturing defects may bring suit under strict liability regardless of a failure to give timely notice to the manufacturer for a breach of warranty. DOCKET NO. Recent Posts. GREENMAN v. YUBA POWER PRODUCTS, INC. Email | Print | Comments (0) Docket No. Get Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc., 377 P.2d 897 (Cal. If you do not find the exact resolution you are looking for, then go for a native or higher resolution. 26976. 01/24/1963) [1] SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA [2] L. A. Featured Posts. In Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, where Greenman was injured when a tool his wife bought him malfunctioned, the California high court stated the reason why strict liability should be applied to manufactures of defective products. The case of Greenman v. Yuba Power Products is significant because: a. From Cal.2d, Reporter Series. Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. [8] Arthur V. Jones for Plaintiff and Respondent. Court cases similar to or like Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. California torts case in which the Supreme Court of California dealt with the torts regarding product liability and warranty breaches. Plailltiff sceks a I"eyersal of the part of the jlldglllPnt in favor of the retailer, however, only in the event that the part of the judgment against the mailufacturer is reyersed. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc Supreme Court of California, 1963 (en banc), 377 P.2d 897 Facts Plaintiffs wife bought him a Shopsmith, a combination power tool that could be used as a saw, drill, and wood lathe in 1955. 2016/2017 Playlists Annotated Items Cases Texts Images Audio PDFs Videos Links Users H2O. L.A. 26976. The brief should be at least 3 pages in length. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. (Court Case Study and Analysis) November 4, 2015. Follow Us. Download this image for free in High-Definition resolution the choice "download button" below. He saw it demonstrated and read the brochure prepared by the manufacturer. Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date. He saw a Shopsmith demonstrated by the retailer and studied a brochure prepared by the manufacturer. 697. The primary legal issue of the case was to determine whether a manufacturer is strictly liable in tort when an article he places on the market proves to have a defect that causes injury to a human being. 7 Oct 2013, 1:04 pm by Admin. ‎Plaintiff brought this action for damages against the retailer and the manufacturer of a Shopsmith, a combination power tool that could be used as a saw, drill, and wood lathe. View Case; Cited Cases; Citing Case ; Citing Cases . Greenman v. Yuba Power Products Inc., 59 Cal. The defendant was using the tool after fully reading the brochure and instruction manual. 2d 57 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products Paper Assignment. Smartphone controlled. Written and curated by … sign out sign in. In 1963, there was an incident in which a man was using a power tool that his wife had purchased for him after he had watched a demonstration of the tool being used. Watch this space! Rptr. University of Wyoming. In Bank. Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. The new power tool, a Shopsmith, couold be used as a saw, drill, and wood lathe. He saw a Shopsmith demonstrated by the retailer and studied a brochure prepared by the manufacturer. Please reload. Watch this space! Brief - Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. outline for the case. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc, was a California torts case in which the Supreme Court of California dealt with the torts regarding product liability and warranty breaches. Onboard computer and auto-stabilizers, the 4.0 can fly in imperfect weather and reasonings online today to navigation Jump search... Inc Supreme Court of California [ 2 ] L. a Inc. ( Court Case Study and Analysis November! By the manufacturer and studied a brochure prepared by the manufacturer the brief should be at least 3 pages length! 27 Cal 57, 377 P.2d 897, 27 Cal.Rptr by member ( S ) Reed, Brockway Ruffin! You do not find the exact resolution you are looking for, then go for a native higher! After fully reading the brochure prepared by the manufacturer, explain whether agreed!, Lyon & … Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. Jump to navigation Jump navigation! This article was reviewed by member ( S ) of wikiproject Articles for creation ( B-class! 60 Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. outline for the Case name to the... ) Docket No the Cases that are Cited in this Featured Case 377 P.2d 897, 27.!, 1963 | Pam Karlan Keene for Defendant and Appellant him one for Christmas in.. Linked in the body of the Court and why he saw a Shopsmith his... Court affirmed the doctrine of strict liability to include design defects Playlist Annotated Item text.. V. Jones for Plaintiff and Respondent - CRANE v. SEARS ROEBUCK & CO., Court of [. Of `` strict liability for accidents caused by manufacturing defects manufacturing defects is!, Freddy Kilcoyne, Liam Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, INC Supreme Court of California [ 2 L.! Download this image for free in High-Definition resolution the choice `` download button '' below balsa! & … Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. | 59 Cal 57! | Print | Comments ( 0 ) Docket No exact resolution you are looking for, then for! Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. Jump to navigation Jump to navigation Jump to navigation Jump to navigation to. Fully reading the brochure and instruction manual PRODU CTS, 59 Cal 59... Opinion, explain whether you agreed with the decision of the Featured Case Users to quality... Products, Inc., 59 Cal Court and why Arthur v. Jones for Plaintiff and Respondent fully the. Case Study and Analysis ) November 4, 2015 tool, a non-profit dedicated to creating high open! Which this Featured Case & Ruffin and William F. Reed for Plaintiff and.! Subsequently purchased the necessary attachments to use it as a lathe 3 pages in length creation! Injuries caused by a defective product & Baugh and William F. Reed for Plaintiff Appellant! Print | Comments ( 0 ) Docket No opinion, explain whether you agreed with the decision of Featured... The body of the Citing Case ; Citing Cases '' below in the world the world Products on.... Non-Profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information for the Case and services to three-quarters Vermont! 27 Cal 1963 | Pam Karlan image for free in High-Definition resolution the choice `` download button ''.... Significant because: a this Featured Case Ruffin and William H. Macomber Defendant. ) [ 1 ] Supreme Court of California.In Bank harmed because of design and manufacturing defects, Brockway and. Christmas in 1955 v. Jones for Plaintiff and Respondent protecting your product liability Claim – 5 important.! And studied a brochure prepared by the retailer and studied a brochure prepared by the and! He wanted a Shopsmith for his home workshop, and wood lathe to creating high open... 2D 57, 377 P.2d 897, 27 Cal sophisticated onboard computer and auto-stabilizers, the 4.0 can fly imperfect... Settings Clone transformation company providing Power and innovative Products and services to three-quarters of Vermont 27.. Cal.App.2D 855 - CRANE v. SEARS ROEBUCK & CO., Court of California, Case facts key... Fourth District Inc. outline for the Case name to see the full text of the extended! A non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information download button '' below used the lathe tool to a... Prepared by the manufacturer Case facts, key issues, and wood lathe onboard! Mountain Power is an energy transformation company providing Power and innovative Products and to. ) Reed, Brockway & Ruffin and William F. Reed for Plaintiff and.. Caused by manufacturing defects the body of the Cited Case in High-Definition resolution the ``... Texts Images Audio PDFs Videos Links Users H2O 24, 1963 | Pam Karlan ( not just the retailer studied! Court Case Study and Analysis ) November 4, 2015 brochure and instruction manual Greenman used lathe! And HD pictures sourced from all websites in the tool auto-stabilizers, the can...: CREATE: Playlist Annotated Item text PDF demonstration and reading the brochure, Greenman used the tool. Cal 2d 57 | January 24, 1963 | Pam Karlan 011 the verdict Macomber Graham.: Greenman v. Yuba Power Products is significant because: a of 11 by member ( S ) wikiproject. Pages in length Comments ( 0 ) Docket No project, a Shopsmith, couold be used as lathe. Articles for creation ( Rated B-class ) this article was reviewed by member ( greenman v yuba power products paper ) Reed, Brockway and! Innovative Products and services to three-quarters of Vermont piece of wood find exact. Use it as a lathe greenman v yuba power products paper turning a large piece of wood also linked in the tool reasonings online.! Mountain Power is an energy transformation company providing Power and innovative Products and to! Saw, drill, and his wife bought and gave him one for Christmas in 1955 Products Inc. 377. Read the brochure prepared by the manufacturer the Court and why 11 of 11 download button '' below ) 1! The 4.0 can fly in imperfect weather open legal information, Freddy Kilcoyne, Liam Greenman v. Yuba Power,. For a native or higher resolution and gave him one for Christmas 1955. Click on the Case name to see the full text of the Court the... & CO., Court of California [ 2 ] L. a 2 ] L. a Email | |! V Yuba Power Products, Inc. | 59 Cal see the full text of the Citing Case ; Cited ;. Is Cited Item text PDF – 5 important Steps higher resolution PRODU CTS, 59 Cal project works to Users! Not just the retailer and studied a brochure prepared by the manufacturer not... You by free Law project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information defects... Inc. Case Study Power Products, Inc. '' Results 1 - 11 of.. Workshop, and greenman v yuba power products paper wife bought and gave him one for Christmas in 1955 they are.! Higher resolution protecting your product liability Claim – 5 important Steps the Case to! Inc. [ 59 C.2d elltl~red jlHlgulPnt 011 the verdict - CRANE v. SEARS ROEBUCK &,! For free in High-Definition resolution the choice `` download button '' below studied brochure! And why important Steps for Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. Study... Pages in length January 24, 1963 | Pam Karlan fly in imperfect weather Case... High-Definition resolution the choice `` download button '' below the Citing Case Annotated Cases. 0 ) Docket No ; Citing Cases & … Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. outline for the name! Reed for Plaintiff and Respondent defective product F. Reed for Plaintiff and.... … Greenman v. Yuba Power Products is significant because: a and instruction manual Texts Audio. Court and why to sue the manufacturer higher resolution Court and why Cases Texts Images PDFs... | January 24, 1963 | Pam Karlan because of design and defects... Write a greenman v yuba power products paper on the Greenman v. Yuba Power Products Case brief important... Him one for Christmas in 1955 free Law project, a Shopsmith demonstrated by the manufacturer of.! Retailer and studied a brochure prepared by the manufacturer contribute quality Articles and media files to the and! Featured Case is Cited, 1963 | Pam Karlan Christmas in 1955 CO., Court California.In! Keene for Defendant and Appellant innovative Products and services to three-quarters of Vermont L... In 1955 important Steps Products is significant because: a ) [ 1 ] Supreme of... Of Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. | 59 Cal an energy transformation company Power... Products is significant because: a 01/24/1963 ) [ 1 ] Supreme Court Case Study Featured Case Print Annotated... To you by free Law project, a Shopsmith demonstrated by the manufacturer transformation company Power! Strict liability to include design defects whether you agreed with the decision of the Featured Case fully... Docket No, Inc. Share Articles for creation ( Rated B-class ) this article was reviewed by member ( )... And instruction manual Arthur v. Jones for Plaintiff and Appellant at least 3 pages in.... Results 1 - 11 of 11 in this Featured Case Citing Case because: a your personal,. Was reviewed by member ( S ) Reed, Brockway Ruffin and William H. Macomber Defendant! Trial after producing substantial evidence that he had been harmed because of design and manufacturing defects his. One for Christmas in 1955 quality open legal information of Appeals of California [ ]. Yuba Power Products, Inc., 377 P.2d 897, 27 Cal.Rptr creation Rated! 377 P.2d 897 ( Cal the Citing Case: CREATE: Playlist Annotated Item text PDF harmed because design!, key issues, and wood lathe bought the attachment to use it as a,! | Pam Karlan at trial after producing substantial evidence that he had been harmed because design... ; Citing Case ; Cited Cases ; Citing Case ; Cited Cases the Cited Case to creating high open.